发布网友 发布时间:2024-10-22 10:59
共5个回答
热心网友 时间:2024-10-26 01:26
the stars should be responsible ,most people buy the product becouse the star is famouse.It's irresponsible if the star don't know about the product he represent but recommend it to the consumers.The Advertising Law in USA formulated that the star must be the user of the product or the advertising will be a false one.
Anti-side:they have no responsibility in law ,if the product have some problem, it's the responsibility of the manufacturer and the
seller .It's not related to the stars.they have no ability to know if the product is good or bad.The SanLu powdered milk have got the National Quality Inspection ,and is exempted from inspection.A product like is ,how should the stars dicide on if he should represent or not?
In my opinion ,wo should be more logos when choosing products.wo shouldn't buy pruducts sightless just becouse it's the product who represented.At the same time ,there should be more close supervision to the quality from the goverment,ang the stars should recommend it to the consumers after they use it,not to represent false ones.
热心网友 时间:2024-10-26 01:23
Zhengfang: Star should be responsible, because a lot of people loved star, because his popularity will go to buy merchandise purchase, if they do not know their own endorsement of the merchandise and irresponsible to recommend the vast number of consumers are very irresponsible act! Advertisement Law of the United States states: "The star must be the real users of products, or there is false advertisement
Anti-side: they do not have the legal responsibility of a Product problem, should be the production and sale of the operator's responsibility, nothing to do with the star. Stars simply do not have the ability to distinguish good and bad products, Sanlu milk powder, "both of the National Quality Inspection report qualified, and are exempt National Product, such Product, star in deciding whether to speak when there will be doubts how?
I feel that our product selection at reasonable consumption should and should not be a star endorsement because blindly buy, at the same time the Government should take the step up supervision of the quality of the enterprises have a very good monitor, and Star Products should also be used in order to recommend consumers should not be irresponsible to advocate false advertisement
热心网友 时间:2024-10-26 01:25
Zhengfang: Star should be responsible, because a lot of people loved star, because his popularity will go to buy merchandise purchase, if they do not know their own endorsement of the merchandise and irresponsible to recommend the vast number of consumers are very irresponsible act! Advertisement Law of the United States states: "The star must be the real users of products, or there is false advertisement
Anti-side: they do not have the legal responsibility of a Product problem, should be the production and sale of the operator's responsibility, nothing to do with the star. Stars simply do not have the ability to distinguish good and bad products, Sanlu milk powder, "both of the National Quality Inspection report qualified, and are exempt National Product, such Product, star in deciding whether to speak when there will be doubts how?
I feel that our product selection at reasonable consumption should and should not be a star endorsement because blindly buy, at the same time the Government should take the step up supervision of the quality of the enterprises have a very good monitor, and Star Products should also be used in order to recommend consumers should not be irresponsible to advocate false advertisement
Supplementary question: other online translation, my own will, those sentences can be riddled with mistakes and I know, how can a teacher give the report?
热心网友 时间:2024-10-26 01:21
看看我的行不行啊
Zhengfang: Star should be responsible, because a lot of people loved star, because his popularity will go to buy merchandise purchase, if they do not know their own endorsement of the merchandise and irresponsible to recommend the vast number of consumers are very irresponsible act! Advertisement Law of the United States states: "The star must be the real users of products, or there is false advertisement
Anti-side: they do not have the legal responsibility of a Product problem, should be the production and sale of the operator's responsibility, nothing to do with the star. Stars simply do not have the ability to distinguish good and bad products, Sanlu milk powder, "both of the National Quality Inspection report qualified, and are exempt National Product, such Product, star in deciding whether to speak when there will be doubts how?
I feel that our product selection at reasonable consumption should and should not be a star endorsement because blindly buy, at the same time the Government should take the step up supervision of the quality of the enterprises have a very good monitor, and Star Products should also be used in order to recommend consumers should not be irresponsible to advocate false advertisement
热心网友 时间:2024-10-26 01:25
Square:
The star should be in chrge .Because many people like the star.Because his well --- known degree can go to buy the goods ,if himself don't know oneself's commodity of acting for others words and not ! The advertising laws and regulations in the U.S.A. fixes:''the star must be to produce
Resist against the side:
They have no responsibility of law.The product went out the problem .should be from responsibility to produce manager .Have nothing to do with the star.The star has not ability to distinguish the product,atall goods "Sanlu Milk Powder" .Since have the state quality and test the qualified report.Is that state room exemptand check the product again.
Such a product
He is when star decide if to act for others the words.
I think:
We when selecting product should rational consamption.Should not act for others the words without clear understanding because of some stars buy.